![]() Call back function further depends on the call of forEach method once it is called for each element in an array in some ascending order. Therefore, its working depends on the call of forEach() method with callback function. It's true that every browser supports for (duh!), but experience proved that something that iterates over a collection for us is simpler as it doesn't force us to take care of a variable for counting, while the (relatively) complex - although well-known - syntax of for is prone to mistakes.How forEach() method works in JavaScript?įorEach() method in JavaScript is mostly associated with some type of ordered data structures like array, maps and sets. ![]() a simple for statement would have worked. Quite heavy when it comes to memory consumption and CPU usage.Ĭonclusion: use document.querySelectorAll instead (which returns a NodeList). It's a live collection that gets updated when the DOM changes. and something that should be avoided in general. ![]() Now, the former does have forEach defined - but it's pretty much the only array method that has been added to its prototype so far.īut it's only a relatively recent addition, so older browsers don't support it - fortunately, the Array#forEach trick works pretty well, down to sufficiently old Internet Explorer versions (probably 6? 5.5? The heck am I saying, that could work for slice, but forEach was added only in IE9.).Ī HTMLCollection is a totally different beast. A small correction: you used document.getElementsB圜lassName which does not return a NodeList but a HTMLCollection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |